Myth‑Busting Misfire: Collateral Damage in mRNA Vaccine Corrections
When health communications can have unintended consequences.
-
-
Retracted: How Politicizers of Science Misinterpret Retractions to Suit Their Own Ends
Retracting scientific journal articles to prevent the spread of misinformation can backfire without careful science communication.
-
Giving young people a voice in the discourse about mental health during COVID-19
Including young people in discussions about mental health is important for open dialogue.
-
Changing COVID vaccine skepticism—one mind at a time
False scientific beliefs are hard to correct. Even when people are exposed to accurate information, their prior beliefs make them resistant
-
Community Engaged Research Partnerships as a SciComm Tool
Communication gaps with marginalized audiences can be improved with community-engaged research partnerships and risk communication framework
-
Communicating risky science when the public isn’t inclined to trust
How do public health decision makers establish trust in their recommendations when the science isn’t settled?
-
Does “good vibes only” make for effective COVID-19 communication?
Is it better to communicate losses or gains in scicomm? COVID-19 research shows that gain framing may be the better choice.
-
The Adventures of Science Communication: Using comics to engage young audiences
Comics are a unique science communication method to engage youth. This study created a set of Covid-19 comics and surveyed students.
-
Scientific jargon – best served with a side of infographics
Finding it difficult to avoid using jargon in your science writing? An infographic will help to effectively communicate your message.
