When two worlds collide: Bringing science journalism and science communication together
Digital media mean that anyone can publish anywhere. Both science journalism and science communication thus need to adapt. Now.
social media
-
-
What’s Backstage: Looking Beyond Audience and Scientist in Shaping SciComm
SciComm is kind of like putting on a performance – so let’s consider the people behind the scenes who help make it possible!
-
Let’s Talk About Forever… Chemicals on Reddit and Twitter
What are PFAS? How do Twitter and Reddit users view PFAS? How can science communicators fill PFAS knowledge gaps exposed on social media?
-
Good Faith, Bad Tweet: A Case Study in Science Communication on Twitter
Twitter drama can be fun to watch or just plain exhausting (or sometimes even both) – but can it teach us anything about sci-comm?
-
r/science Let’s Talk Science Communication (AMA)
Ask me Anything (AMA) threads on the popular social media site Reddit allow for direct science communication to an expert in a particular field of study, as well engage discussion between the host and different members of the audience.
-
More than just cat videos: YouTube as a platform for science engagement
YouTube is a significant source of science content – and triggering emotions can lead to greater public engagement.
-
Tweets, Selfies, and GIFs: Bridging the Gap between Science Communicators and their Audiences
Curious about what strategies science communicators use over social media to connect and engage with their audiences?
-
Want to reach more people on social media? Here’s what to consider!
Dynamic content outperforms static content, but the style of dynamic content to post and platform to choose depends on your goals!
