Navigating the wild west of scicomm: is your online content actually any good?
The internet is becoming the wild-west of SciComm where not even the experts can help us distinguish between the good, the bad and the ugly.
Applications are open for our 2025 cohort!
Visit our hiring call for more information.
The internet is becoming the wild-west of SciComm where not even the experts can help us distinguish between the good, the bad and the ugly.
Zoos use YouTube for science communication and choose which animals and educational facts to include, whilst still being entertaining.
Concerns about media’s failure to address risks of meditation app highlight the need for balanced and evidence-based support for wellbeing.
False scientific beliefs are hard to correct. Even when people are exposed to accurate information, their prior beliefs make them resistant
Study shows educating parents on adolescent brain development improves parenting, highlighting the need for more research and support.
Researchers analyzed data from three surveys, concluding that direct measures of “trust” in scientists are unclear in what they represent.
This research seeks to measure the impact of reader online comments to science stories. Do they affect the credibility of the reporting?
Unveiling Film’s AI Gender Gap: On-screen AI scientists reflect real-world gender disparity
Rutgers’ “science in action” documentaries focus on making scientists relatable to increase audience engagement.
Citizen science may create a new avenue for communication between scientists and the public through hands-on engagement.