We(men) in science – Understanding the matilda effect in science communication
Matilda effect in science communication: Male authors seen as producing higher scientific quality and more collaboration-worthy than women.
Community Engaged Research Partnerships as a SciComm Tool
Communication gaps with marginalized audiences can be improved with community-engaged research partnerships and risk communication framework
Communicating risky science when the public isn’t inclined to trust
How do public health decision makers establish trust in their recommendations when the science isn’t settled?
Scientists want to get out of the lab and into public engagement
Scientists support public engagement, but need support from institutions to be effective.
Stop, listen, and reflect: How to incorporate reflection in your science communication
Stop, listen, and reflect: How to incorporate reflection in your science communication
Does “good vibes only” make for effective COVID-19 communication?
Is it better to communicate losses or gains in scicomm? COVID-19 research shows that gain framing may be the better choice.
Unraveling the Characteristics of Prominent Scientists during the COVID-19 Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic brought many changes, but the traits that make scientists popular in the media are still very similar.
Ink and Insight: Unveiling the Alchemy of Short Stories in Science Communication
Well-written short stories are potent tools for science communication, engaging audiences and conveying scientific information effectively.
When two worlds collide: Bringing science journalism and science communication together
Digital media mean that anyone can publish anywhere. Both science journalism and science communication thus need to adapt. Now.
Do climate change communications need more f***ing aggression?
Aggression in climate change communications increase expectancy violation, decreasing willingness to engage in pro-environmental behaviors.