User Comments: Do They Affect The Credibility Of Science Stories?
This research seeks to measure the impact of reader online comments to science stories. Do they affect the credibility of the reporting?
How do you picture AI scientists? Odds are it’s male.
Unveiling Film’s AI Gender Gap: On-screen AI scientists reflect real-world gender disparity
Science in Action Films as the Blockbusters of SciComm
Rutgers’ “science in action” documentaries focus on making scientists relatable to increase audience engagement.
Beyond Data Collection: The Transformative Role of Citizen Science in Public Engagement
Citizen science may create a new avenue for communication between scientists and the public through hands-on engagement.
Data Sonification: Give Data a Voice
Grab headphones for this one! Listen to the data instead of staring at a graph. That’s data sonification making scicomm more inclusive!
Science Communication for Republicans and Evangelicals – Where do we even start?
This study identifies Republicans and Evangelicals as two groups who are likely to view scientists as a threat.
A picture worth more than a thousand words
Street art such as murals can be a creative means of science communication by transforming public spaces for education and awareness.
ByrdBot: Simulated tweets to communicate climate change
Scientists create a web application that generates soundscapes using bird sounds and population data to communicate climate change.
Delving into the Vibrant World of Science Communication on Reddit’s r/science
This study examines user-generated science communication on Reddit’s r/science, exploring topics, user engagement, and moderation.
We(men) in science – Understanding the matilda effect in science communication
Matilda effect in science communication: Male authors seen as producing higher scientific quality and more collaboration-worthy than women.