Scientists Are Respected but Not Trusted: Improving Science Communication through Trust
“Science communication works best when centered on teaching and sharing, rather than persuasion, particularly in sensitive topics like climate science.”
-
-
Does Information Source Matter in Health Communication? A Public Perspective
Ok, so we’ve all been guilty of consulting Dr. Google for health advice at some point. However, if a google search pulls up advice from a health expert or a generative AI, which sources are most likely to be trusted?
-
Uncertain times, uncertain science: How the public views scientific uncertainty
Scientists break down uncertainty in subthemes to better understand and study public understanding of scientific uncertainty.
-
In Science We Trust: Identifying Cues for Trust in Science Media
Who trusts who? And how? Researchers look at how trust cues influence perceptions of science media.
-
Science on Trial: Perspectives on Scientists and Society Across 68 Countries
Public trust crisis? Objection! Survey suggests global trust in scientists strong.
-
Quid Pro Quo: Does Sharing Personal Details Encourage Audiences to Lend Their Trust?
Researchers who share personal details about themselves can increase the layperson’s perception of their benevolence and integrity.
-
In science, we trust… but what exactly is trust?
Researchers analyzed data from three surveys, concluding that direct measures of “trust” in scientists are unclear in what they represent.
-
Science in Action Films as the Blockbusters of SciComm
Rutgers’ “science in action” documentaries focus on making scientists relatable to increase audience engagement.
-
From Clicks to Change: Empowering Society through Science Communication on Social Media
This article delves into science communicators’ impact on social media, spotlighting John Green’s #PatientsNotPatents campaign.
-
Scientists behaving badly–how does the public respond?
Although the reasons aren’t entirely clear, there is no question that uncivil disagreement erodes trust in science.
