How do you picture AI scientists? Odds are it’s male.
Unveiling Film’s AI Gender Gap: On-screen AI scientists reflect real-world gender disparity
Unveiling Film’s AI Gender Gap: On-screen AI scientists reflect real-world gender disparity
Rutgers’ “science in action” documentaries focus on making scientists relatable to increase audience engagement.
Citizen science may create a new avenue for communication between scientists and the public through hands-on engagement.
Grab headphones for this one! Listen to the data instead of staring at a graph. That’s data sonification making scicomm more inclusive!
This study identifies Republicans and Evangelicals as two groups who are likely to view scientists as a threat.
Street art such as murals can be a creative means of science communication by transforming public spaces for education and awareness.
Scientists create a web application that generates soundscapes using bird sounds and population data to communicate climate change.
This study examines user-generated science communication on Reddit’s r/science, exploring topics, user engagement, and moderation.
Matilda effect in science communication: Male authors seen as producing higher scientific quality and more collaboration-worthy than women.
Communication gaps with marginalized audiences can be improved with community-engaged research partnerships and risk communication framework