Delving into the Vibrant World of Science Communication on Reddit’s r/science
This study examines user-generated science communication on Reddit’s r/science, exploring topics, user engagement, and moderation.
-
-
We(men) in science – Understanding the matilda effect in science communication
Matilda effect in science communication: Male authors seen as producing higher scientific quality and more collaboration-worthy than women.
-
Community Engaged Research Partnerships as a SciComm Tool
Communication gaps with marginalized audiences can be improved with community-engaged research partnerships and risk communication framework
-
Bringing art back to science: A tale of two art science programs
The intersection of art and science creates a new means of science communication. ArtSci programs are popping up at research institutions.
-
Communicating risky science when the public isn’t inclined to trust
How do public health decision makers establish trust in their recommendations when the science isn’t settled?
-
Scientists want to get out of the lab and into public engagement
Scientists support public engagement, but need support from institutions to be effective.
-
Stop, listen, and reflect: How to incorporate reflection in your science communication
Stop, listen, and reflect: How to incorporate reflection in your science communication
-
Does “good vibes only” make for effective COVID-19 communication?
Is it better to communicate losses or gains in scicomm? COVID-19 research shows that gain framing may be the better choice.
-
Should you do a Science Communication Masters?
Should you do a Science Communication Master’s? It’s a difficult question to answer and goes beyond just prospective students.
-
Unraveling the Characteristics of Prominent Scientists during the COVID-19 Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic brought many changes, but the traits that make scientists popular in the media are still very similar.
