User Comments: Do They Affect The Credibility Of Science Stories?
This research seeks to measure the impact of reader online comments to science stories. Do they affect the credibility of the reporting?
-
-
How do you picture AI scientists? Odds are it’s male.
Unveiling Film’s AI Gender Gap: On-screen AI scientists reflect real-world gender disparity
-
Science in Action Films as the Blockbusters of SciComm
Rutgers’ “science in action” documentaries focus on making scientists relatable to increase audience engagement.
-
Beyond Data Collection: The Transformative Role of Citizen Science in Public Engagement
Citizen science may create a new avenue for communication between scientists and the public through hands-on engagement.
-
SciPEP 2023: New Insights for Communicating Basic Science – Executive Summary
SciPEP 2023 explored basic science communication. This post summarizes the 2-day conference with a focus on the opening & closing sessions.
-
Data Sonification: Give Data a Voice
Grab headphones for this one! Listen to the data instead of staring at a graph. That’s data sonification making scicomm more inclusive!
-
Science Communication for Republicans and Evangelicals – Where do we even start?
This study identifies Republicans and Evangelicals as two groups who are likely to view scientists as a threat.
-
From Clicks to Change: Empowering Society through Science Communication on Social Media
This article delves into science communicators’ impact on social media, spotlighting John Green’s #PatientsNotPatents campaign.
-
A picture worth more than a thousand words
Street art such as murals can be a creative means of science communication by transforming public spaces for education and awareness.
-
ByrdBot: Simulated tweets to communicate climate change
Scientists create a web application that generates soundscapes using bird sounds and population data to communicate climate change.
